Straumann® RevEX™ Scanbody

Digital. Comfortable. Simple.

Buy now
Contact us

Reduce the number of visits by 40% with Straumann® RevEX™ – the key to enable a fully digital workflow for the final full arch restoration.

Key indications
Edentulous
Material
Titanium 
Workflow
Digital
Implant Systems
BLT | BLC | BLX
Abutment Level Connection
SRA 3.5 SRA 4.6

Glossary of abbreviations >

40% less time1,2
Easy to integrate in your worfklow

3 visits instead of 51,2
Reduce the number of visits by 40% with Straumann® RevEX™ – the key to enable a fully digital workflow for the final full arch restoration

Get more
Comfort, simplicity, efficiency2, precision1, patient comfort3-6

And less
Difficulty1, time1,2, visits2

Brochures and videos

Looking for additional information? You'll find them in the Download Center.

Featured stories on youTooth

Contact us

Data usage agreement*

Read our privacy notice.

Please retype the code above

References

1 Panos Papaspyridakos, Armand Bedrossian , Yukio Kudara , Panagiotis Ntovas , Abdullah Bokhary , Konstantinos Chochlidakis . Reverse scan body: A complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication. Journal of Prosthodontics, 202 2 E. Armand Bedrossian DDS, MSD, FACP, Panos Papaspyridakos DDS, MS, PhD, Edmond Bedrossian DDS, FACOMS, FAO, FITI “The Reverse Scan Body protocol”: Completing the Digital Workflow, Compendium June 2023 (will be published in August) 3 Vandeweghe S, Vervack V, Dierens M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;28:648-53. 4 Cappare P, Sannino G, Minoli M, Montemezzi P, Ferrini F. Conventional versus digital impressions for full arch screw-retained maxillary re-habilitations: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:829. 5 Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. J Healthc Eng 2017;2017:8427595 6 Gallardo YR, Bohner L, Tortamano P, Pigozzo MN, Laganá DC, Sesma N. Patient outcomes and procedure working time 9for digital versus conventional impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:214-9.

Discover the straumann® REVEX™ SCANBODY

Digital. Comfortable. Simple.

Learn more
Contact us

a game changer

“Extraoral scanning with the novel Straumann® RevEX™ is a game changer. It facilitates a complete digital full-arch workflow in a precise and efficient manner.”

Dr. Panos Papaspyridakos, USA

OVERCOMING THE CHALLENGES OF INTRAORAL SCANNING

“The Straumann® RevEX™ scanbodies provide an alternative method to efficiently and precisely capturing the full arch implant positions. Better yet, this extraoral technique overcomes the challenges of intraoral scanning, making it a practical way for clinicians to stay in a digital workflow.”

Dr. Armand Bedrossian, USA

40% less time.1,2
easy to integrate in your workflow.

Watch video

3 visits instead of 51,2

Reduce the number of visits by 40% with Straumann® RevEX™ – the key to enable a fully digital workflow for the final full arch restoration.
Visit 1

Digital impression.
Visit 2

Try in prototype.
Visit 3

Delivery.

step-by-step workflow

From temporary to final restoration with Dr. Panos Papaspyridakos.

Watch video
Download as a PDF

Get More

Comfort
Simplicity
Efficiency2
Precision1
Patient comfort3-6

 

And less

Difficulty1
Time1,2
Visits2

tips & tricks

Tips and tricks with Dr. Panos Papaspyridakos.

Watch video

Straumann® RevEX™ for labs

Final full-arch restoration with Straumann® RevEX™ fully digital workflow

On-demand webinar

Dr. Armand Bedrossian, Dr. Panos Papaspyridakos

Register now

Clinical cases

Learn more about our digital solutions

Learn more about our fixed full-arch solutions

Contact us

Data usage agreement*

Read our privacy notice.

Please retype the code above

References

1 Panos Papaspyridakos, Armand Bedrossian , Yukio Kudara , Panagiotis Ntovas , Abdullah Bokhary , Konstantinos Chochlidakis . Reverse scan body: A complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication. Journal of Prosthodontics, 202 2 E. Armand Bedrossian DDS, MSD, FACP, Panos Papaspyridakos DDS, MS, PhD, Edmond Bedrossian DDS, FACOMS, FAO, FITI “The Reverse Scan Body protocol”: Completing the Digital Workflow, Compendium June 2023 (will be published in August) 3 Vandeweghe S, Vervack V, Dierens M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;28:648-53. 4 Cappare P, Sannino G, Minoli M, Montemezzi P, Ferrini F. Conventional versus digital impressions for full arch screw-retained maxillary re-habilitations: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:829. 5 Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. J Healthc Eng 2017;2017:8427595 6 Gallardo YR, Bohner L, Tortamano P, Pigozzo MN, Laganá DC, Sesma N. Patient outcomes and procedure working time 9for digital versus conventional impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:214-9.