Straumann® RevEX™ Scanbody

Digital. Comfortable. Simple.

Reduce the number of visits by 40% with Straumann® RevEX™ – the key to enable a fully digital workflow for the final full arch restoration.

Key indications
Edentulous
Material
Titanium 
Workflow
Digital
Implant Systems
BLT | BLC | BLX
Abutment Level Connection
SRA 3.5 SRA 4.6

40% less time1,2
Easy to integrate in your worfklow

3 visits instead of 51,2
Reduce the number of visits by 40% with Straumann® RevEX™ – the key to enable a fully digital workflow for the final full arch restoration

Get more
Comfort, simplicity, efficiency2, precision1, patient comfort3-6

And less
Difficulty1, time1,2, visits2

Brochures and videos

Looking for additional information? You'll find them in the Download Center.

Featured stories on youTooth

register your interest

Data usage agreement*

Read our privacy notice.

Please retype the code above

References

1 Panos Papaspyridakos, Armand Bedrossian , Yukio Kudara , Panagiotis Ntovas , Abdullah Bokhary , Konstantinos Chochlidakis . Reverse scan body: A complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication. Journal of Prosthodontics, 202 2 E. Armand Bedrossian DDS, MSD, FACP, Panos Papaspyridakos DDS, MS, PhD, Edmond Bedrossian DDS, FACOMS, FAO, FITI “The Reverse Scan Body protocol”: Completing the Digital Workflow, Compendium June 2023 (will be published in August) 3 Vandeweghe S, Vervack V, Dierens M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;28:648-53. 4 Cappare P, Sannino G, Minoli M, Montemezzi P, Ferrini F. Conventional versus digital impressions for full arch screw-retained maxillary re-habilitations: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:829. 5 Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. J Healthc Eng 2017;2017:8427595 6 Gallardo YR, Bohner L, Tortamano P, Pigozzo MN, Laganá DC, Sesma N. Patient outcomes and procedure working time 9for digital versus conventional impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:214-9.