#Esthetics 06. Oct 2016

Predictable GBR procedures in sites with high esthetic compromise

A clinical case report by Jorge M. Galante, Argentina

The patient, a 45 year-old female in good general systemic health, had undergone some unsuccessful dental treatments, with failed restorations resulting in the loss of multiple maxillary teeth. Teeth 1.2 to 2.2 were extracted after failed endodontic treatments and periapical complications. The aim of the patient was to replace the removable partial prosthesis with a fixed implant supported restoration.

Treatment planning

The clinical examination showed a significant horizontal deficiency of the anterior(Figs. 1, 2). Panorex Rx (Fig. 3). Study models mounted on a semi-adjustable articulator were taken and a diagnostic wax-up of the four incisors was made with a modeled gingiva (Fig. 4) to provide an idea of the amount of tissue to be regenerated. In the axial slices and the 3D reformatted CT images, the lack of bone in the horizontal and vertical dimensions could be evaluated precisely. A stepwise surgical approach was planned: in a first step, a GBR procedure would be performed. In a second step, two submerged implants should be inserted and, if necessary, an additional GBR procedure performed. In a third step, implants should be uncovered together with a soft tissue augmentation. The initiation of the prosthetic phase was planned 30 days after the implant activation surgery.

Surgical procedure

Related posts